top of page

The GCC 'Cost Centre' Label Is a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Aug 28
2 min read

Call a capability a cost centre long enough and it will behave like one. You will fund it like overhead, staff it for throughput, and then be puzzled when it never moves up the value chain.


India's Global Capability Centres are the clearest example. There are roughly 1,700 of them, employing close to 1.9 million people and generating on the order of $64 billion a year, according to NASSCOM. And yet many are still described inside their own parent companies as a cost line to be optimised.


The label is not a description. It is an instruction. Budget, hiring, and mandate all follow the word you use.

How the label traps the centre


A cost centre is measured on efficiency: cost per seat, utilisation, throughput. Those metrics are not wrong, but they are the metrics of execution, not judgement. Optimise them hard enough and you build a centre that is very good at doing what it is told and structurally unable to decide what should be done.


The work that moves a GCC up the value chain, owning outcomes, advising the business, making the call, depends on capabilities the cost-centre model never funds: communication, stakeholder influence, judgement under ambiguity, and local leadership.


The four stages of GCC maturity


Most centres sit somewhere on a curve from execution to strategic ownership. Naming where you actually are is the first honest step.


  • Execution: you deliver defined tasks to a spec set elsewhere.

  • Judgement: you own quality and make trade-offs inside your scope.

  • Advisory: the business asks your opinion before it decides.

  • Strategic: you shape what the business does, not just how.



The skeptic's objection


Our GCC is already strategic.

Some are. The way to know is not the org chart, it is where your people actually operate day to day, and what the parent company asks of them. In our experience the gap to the next stage is rarely technical. It is communication, influence, and leadership, the skills a cost-centre budget never buys. You cannot metric your way out of a label, but you can outgrow it.


Sources


  • NASSCOM, India GCC data: approximately 1,700 centres, close to 1.9 million employees, and on the order of USD 64 billion in annual revenue (nasscom.in).


Written by Mahesh Tharani. Connect on LinkedIn.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page